Goto

Collaborating Authors

 lqr problem






Dual-Regularized Riccati Recursions for Interior-Point Optimal Control

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Abstract-- We derive closed-form extensions of Riccati's recursions (both sequential [4] and parallel [7]) for solving dual-regularized LQR problems. We show how these methods can be used to solve general constrained, non-convex, discrete-time optimal control problems via a regularized interior point method, while guaranteeing that each primal step is a descent direction of an Augmented Barrier-Lagrangian merit function. We provide MIT -licensed implementations of our methods in C++ and JAX. Numerical optimal control, both real-time and offline, has found numerous application domains, ranging from trajectory optimization for robotics (e.g. for autonomous cars, unmanned aerial vehicles, legged robots) and airspace (e.g. Continuous-time optimal control problems, whose optimization variables are functions (thus infinite-dimensional) are typically converted into finite-dimensional optimization problems by either shooting (i.e.



Stabilizing Dynamical Systems via Policy Gradient Methods Juan C. Perdomo University of California, Berkeley Jack Umenberger MIT Max Simchowitz MIT

Neural Information Processing Systems

Stabilizing an unknown control system is one of the most fundamental problems in control systems engineering. In this paper, we provide a simple, model-free algorithm for stabilizing fully observed dynamical systems. While model-free methods have become increasingly popular in practice due to their simplicity and flexibility, stabilization via direct policy search has received surprisingly little attention. Our algorithm proceeds by solving a series of discounted LQR problems, where the discount factor is gradually increased. We prove that this method efficiently recovers a stabilizing controller for linear systems, and for smooth, nonlinear systems within a neighborhood of their equilibria. Our approach overcomes a significant limitation of prior work, namely the need for a pre-given stabilizing control policy. We empirically evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on common control benchmarks.




Some remarks on gradient dominance and LQR policy optimization

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Solutions of optimization problems, including policy optimization in reinforcement learning, typically rely upon some variant of gradient descent. There has been much recent work in the machine learning, control, and optimization communities applying the Polyak-Łojasiewicz Inequality (PLI) to such problems in order to establish an exponential rate of convergence (a.k.a. ``linear convergence'' in the local-iteration language of numerical analysis) of loss functions to their minima under the gradient flow. Often, as is the case of policy iteration for the continuous-time LQR problem, this rate vanishes for large initial conditions, resulting in a mixed globally linear / locally exponential behavior. This is in sharp contrast with the discrete-time LQR problem, where there is global exponential convergence. That gap between CT and DT behaviors motivates the search for various generalized PLI-like conditions, and this talk will address that topic. Moreover, these generalizations are key to understanding the transient and asymptotic effects of errors in the estimation of the gradient, errors which might arise from adversarial attacks, wrong evaluation by an oracle, early stopping of a simulation, inaccurate and very approximate digital twins, stochastic computations (algorithm ``reproducibility''), or learning by sampling from limited data. We describe an ``input to state stability'' (ISS) analysis of this issue. The second part discusses convergence and PLI-like properties of ``linear feedforward neural networks'' in feedback control. Much of the work described here was done in collaboration with Arthur Castello B. de Oliveira, Leilei Cui, Zhong-Ping Jiang, and Milad Siami.